Posted - 2009.10.20 13:08:00 - [3]

 

Originally by: Baka Lakadaka

---

Are you going to provide a list of participating candidates - possibly allowing them to link to their own sites? I ran through it quickly and answered the questions - got my result (Dierdra Vaal matches with 62%) - but didn't see any evidence of any other candidates having any participation.

---

once CCP confirms the candidates they will be on the website :)

Posted - 2009.10.21 01:47:00 - [5]

 

bumping this

Posted - 2009.10.21 23:52:00 - [7]

 

Thank you. I have found these political sites interesting and useful in crowded races.

Obviously, nothing in the S&I is as common as the T1 loot drop question, although "almost all T1 items should be manufactured by players" is somewhat more general than "no T1M0 loot drops"
Some statements that I think might distinguish the candidates, although for some candidates more appropriate for some S&I questions might be"don't know, don't care"

0.0 Production should be one of the areas of competition for 0.0 Alliances.
Insurance payouts on T2 ships should be raised.
Insurance payouts from death-by-Concord should be lowered.
0.0 Manufacturing should be a viable career
Hi Sec manufacturing should be a viable career
Hi Sec minerals should be increased
Lo Sec minerals should be increased
Modifying orders should have minimum increments or #/day
It should be easier to pirate ships in hi-sec
It should be easier to kill POS in hi-sec
There should be more access to ME research slots in hi sec
Corruption (Las Vegas 2009) should be developed
CCP should spend some effort on "quality of life"/"ease of use" issues for non-combat user interface
EVE industrialists should be able to produce for DUST 514 players.

Regardless of whether there is room to include any of these, thank for the efforts and looking forward to the results. I can't see voting for any candidate who doesn't bother to participate.