Search

 
 Join the Community, Create an EVE-ONLINE account or log in.

open All Channels
sepopen Warfare & Tactics
blankseplocked W&T forum, Vote Match needs your help!
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.

New Topic   
 
Author Topic

Dierdra Vaal


Caldari
Eve University
Ivy League
Posted - 2009.10.19 21:59:00 - [1]
 

What?
I have developed a website based on the dutch StemWijzer, a website that allows you to compare different political parties. The website presents the user with a list of statements ("PvP should be optional", "Trade orders should have a 1000 ISK minimum increment", etc), and compares the answers the user gives to the answers given by CSM candidates. Using this comparison the website then calculates a match percentage, neatly identifying which candidate represents the user's views the best. It may sound confusing, just try it out here: http://match.eve-csm.com.

I maintain a full discussion topic on general issues here.

What do I need from the Warfare & Tactics forum?
I need statements to fill my questionaire. These statements need to cover all dimensions of the game equally in order to give all candidates fair representation. Statements also should be carefully formed so they do not show bias. I'm posting similar requests in other forums.

The statements have 5 answer options that we cannot deviate from: strongly disagree, disagree, no opinion, agree, strongly agree.

A few examples of good questions:
* Indefinite cloaking is a problem and should be changed.
* 0.0 infrastructure should only be vulnerable to large fleets of organized players supported by capital ships.
* Suicide ganking should be a viable tactic.

A few examples of bad questions:
* In what space do you spend most of your time? (you cannot answer this with agree/disagee)
* Unnecessarily cumbersome game mechanics related to contracts, the market, and science/industry should be streamlined or eliminated. (A loaded question, nobody will disagree that 'Unnecessarily cumbersome' mechanics should be changed)

So please, if you have any statement suggestions, post them here!

Lupo Manaro
Posted - 2009.10.19 22:15:00 - [2]
 

Will definitely use this. thanks.

Haxfar Portlaind
Posted - 2009.10.20 13:27:00 - [3]
 

nice doned. But why is you it compare the result with? Confused

Avan Sercedos
The Fallen Brotherhood
Posted - 2009.10.20 14:40:00 - [4]
 

Originally by: Haxfar Portlaind
nice doned. But why is you it compare the result with? Confused


The candidates haven't filled out their versions of the form yet, since the form isn't complete. When it's done, it is supposed to show which candidate most closely resembles the user's responses.

At least, that's what I assume.

yani dumyat
Minmatar
Black Storm Cartel
The Orca Syndicate
Posted - 2009.10.20 15:01:00 - [5]
 

Originally by: Dierdra Vaal

So please, if you have any statement suggestions, post them here!



Bounty hunting should be a viable profession.

Dierdra Vaal


Caldari
Eve University
Ivy League
Posted - 2009.10.20 15:09:00 - [6]
 

Originally by: Avan Sercedos
Originally by: Haxfar Portlaind
nice doned. But why is you it compare the result with? Confused


The candidates haven't filled out their versions of the form yet, since the form isn't complete. When it's done, it is supposed to show which candidate most closely resembles the user's responses.

At least, that's what I assume.


yup, right now, Dierdra Vaal is just a dummy candidate :)

Tagami Wasp
Caldari
Sarz'na Khumatari
Ushra'Khan
Posted - 2009.10.20 15:47:00 - [7]
 

Surveys... Studying Quality?

Fille Balle
Ballbreakers R us
Posted - 2009.10.20 18:48:00 - [8]
 

Edited by: Fille Balle on 20/10/2009 18:53:21
I really like this, so I'll post a few suggestions here as well:

1. All forms of ewar are equally good
2. Dreadnaughts need a new role, as after Domination there will be no need to field any
3. Drones are not broken, could use a bit of tweaking, but overall they're fine
4. Station games really add to the game, no need to tweak anything here
5. Highsec wars are in need of a complete overhaul
6. Missiles don't need a boost
7. Blasters really need a boost
8. Caldari ships are fine for pvp
9. Lasers are not ovepowered
10. Marauders need a boost to make them viable for pvp
11. NPC concord should be removed, concord should be contolled by the players
12. Bubbles should be allowed in lowsec
13. Blob tactics should always remain a valid tactic in eve
14. There never was, nor should there ever be room for solo pvp in a mmo
15. Arenas will destroy "real" pvp if they are ever introduced
16. Ganking noobs is healthy for the game, and more tools should be introduced in order to make this process simpler for experinced players
17. Active tanking is at least as effective as buffertanking
18. If active tanking recieved a boost, remote repairer battleship gangs would be a thing of the past

That's all I can think of right now. I hope it helps. I'll post some more later, when I can think of some more.

Disclaimer: The statements above do not represent my own opinions, but are written in order to prevent candidates from clicking 1 or 5 on all the questions in order to yield the desired result.

Originally by: Tagami Wasp
Surveys... Studying Quality?


It's a work in progress, and Val is currently collecting statements for people to agree/disagree with. After you fill out the questionaire, your answers will be compared with the CSM candidate's answers to find a suitable match.

If you find this confusing, click the link and try it. Bear in mind that the survey is not completed, and the current one is just to demonstrate how it works (not sure if that actually is Val's opinions, but I don't think so).


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.

New Topic