Originally by: Darina Rea
Comments please?
All this warping around in fast ships has probably warped (pun intended) your perspective of distance.
I do not know exactly the interval between the first observed disappearance of this phenomena, and the last, but it was without doubt a _very_ short interval. Less than a day at most, perhaps close to instantly.
So if we look at your diagrams and consider the above, and assume it was photons traveling from that far-away source at the usual speed. Imagine then that we have a sphere with the phenomena at the center. Now let's look at the largest possible interval, 24 hours or less, in which the phenomena disappearing was observed throughout the cluster. One day is the time it takes for light to travel from the outer planets to the sun of a typical solar system.
Then remember the sphere surface that represents the appearance and cutoff intervals of the phenomena. Imagine those as two (very) slightly curved section of the spheres surfaces, one light-day thick. Now looks at your pod's map of the cluster.
Even in optimal conditions the best-fit would still be require an interval (or thickness of the sphere surface) far exceeding the lifetime of a well-treated minmatar slave, and they live longer than a day...
This applies no matter where the phenomena was located, assuming there was just one source.
---
So what can we conclude from this? That the phenomena can't be both far away _and_ emitting photons that travel at the usual speed of light. It would have to be at least 4 to 5 orders of magnitude faster than normal light, and that's a very conservative estimate of the lower-bound.
It has been said that extra-ordinary claims requires extra-ordinary proof... We got the proof, but I'm rather confused as to what the claim is.