| Author |
Topic |
 Faraelle Brightman Gallente Eleutherian Guard
|
Posted - 2008.12.10 20:30:00 - [ 1]
Now that CCP has made the offical Eve wiki live, I think this is our best chance to combine and organize the various player resources in a place where they can be preserved and maintined.
For example, I've started the Intaki article by way of the old Intaki Canonical Resources thread. I know the Amarr and Minmatar RP groups have their lists; there'a also the various other bloodline-related threads, the dusty logs of Aurora events...
One thing I'd strongly recomend is that CCP prime fiction be kept seperated from both player fiction and player speculation about prime fiction., with the exception of AURORA events where an actor was directly present and speeking. Main articles about bloodlines, characters, etc. ought to aim for something akin to a Wikipedia-like neutrality standard.
Mostly, though, I just want to see everything accessable from one place. So get to it! |
 Stitcher Caldari Lai Dai Infinity Systems |
Posted - 2008.12.11 00:17:00 - [ 2]
Edited by: Stitcher on 11/12/2008 00:20:54LinkyMan, I am going to waste so many hours writing about fictional things. Why do I think that's a good thing?   I was thinking of starting with the Ishukone Corporation's page. |
 Myrhial Arkenath Ghost Festival Naraka. |
Posted - 2008.12.11 08:13:00 - [ 3]
Edited by: Myrhial Arkenath on 12/12/2008 13:56:05 If I find the time, I will certainly see how I can contribute to it. |
 Dex Nederland Caldari Lai Dai Infinity Systems
|
Posted - 2008.12.11 14:57:00 - [ 4]
Originally by: Faraelle Brightman One thing I'd strongly recomend is that CCP prime fiction be kept seperated from both player fiction and player speculation about prime fiction., with the exception of AURORA events where an actor was directly present and speeking. Main articles about bloodlines, characters, etc. ought to aim for something akin to a Wikipedia-like neutrality standard.
I am not entirely sure about Wiki architecture, but would it be possible to have a section of the Prime Fiction entry locked and allow players to add to it? For example an entry on the Deteris may be very short, but additional information is available from other sources of PF. So the user-editors can add to the basic PF entry, but not the basic information. |
 Horatius Caul Amarr Cataphractia Imperiates
|
Posted - 2008.12.11 15:26:00 - [ 5]
I'm not sure on how to handle Fanon and Player Development in the blog. Personally, I would definitely like to see some stuff like the Achura thread included in the Wiki - things that fill in blanks where the PF hasn't gone yet. Perhaps the World Development project could also be involved, allowing players to describe made-up details of planets. |
 Garion Avarr Amarr Adhocracy Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 02:32:00 - [ 6]
It has promise, though it also has a good deal of problems. . . . |
 Stitcher Caldari Lai Dai Infinity Systems |
Posted - 2008.12.12 10:47:00 - [ 7]
Originally by: Garion Avarr It has promise, though it also has a good deal of problems. . . .
It's a wiki, mate - if you see a problem, go fix it. Cryptic observations aren't really all that constructive. |
 Scagga Laebetrovo Sebiestor tribe
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 13:16:00 - [ 8]
hurrah! |
 Garion Avarr Amarr Adhocracy Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 21:00:00 - [ 9]
Originally by: Stitcher
Originally by: Garion Avarr It has promise, though it also has a good deal of problems. . . .
It's a wiki, mate - if you see a problem, go fix it. Cryptic observations aren't really all that constructive.
Well, the main problem I was referring to was that one is not able to fix a lot of the pages with inaccuracies, due to them being locked as 'official content' (but being based on out of date material or misleadingly named). Most of the other problems tend to fall into the category of being problems only because it is more restrictive than most wikia (is that the correct plural, I think?). Off the top of my head, the autolinking of certain terms (though I've just thought of a way to try and prevent it), and possibly the requirement for pages to be approved, though that hasn't been so much a problem for me as I've heard other people say it has for them. |
 Ileya Torsii Gallente Stillwater Corporation |
Posted - 2008.12.12 23:05:00 - [ 10]
|
 Dex Nederland Caldari Lai Dai Infinity Systems
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 23:27:00 - [ 11]
Originally by: Garion Avarr Well, the main problem I was referring to was that one is not able to fix a lot of the pages with inaccuracies, due to them being locked as 'official content' (but being based on out of date material or misleadingly named).
Most of the other problems tend to fall into the category of being problems only because it is more restrictive than most wikia (is that the correct plural, I think?). Off the top of my head, the autolinking of certain terms (though I've just thought of a way to try and prevent it), and possibly the requirement for pages to be approved, though that hasn't been so much a problem for me as I've heard other people say it has for them.
I actually like the approval process as it puts a second set of eyes on the page itself. However there are problems like being unable to correct the Wikibot's pages. For example the Hawk and Harpy have old pictures and not the accurate ones. Now, here is a question: should we create/edit our own entries, be they individual or corporate (so Stitcher editing Duty.'s entry as an example)? My understanding is that this is generally a "no-no" on wikipedia. Now what it would do is mean that your organization has to be sufficiently well known for others to want to present it. This being said, I doubt we can stop the Goons, GBC, etc from creating and editing their own entries. |
 Stitcher Caldari Lai Dai Infinity Systems |
Posted - 2008.12.13 01:05:00 - [ 12]
Edited by: Stitcher on 13/12/2008 01:07:00 Originally by: Dex Nederland Now, here is a question: should we create/edit our own entries, be they individual or corporate (so Stitcher editing Duty.'s entry as an example)? My understanding is that this is generally a "no-no" on wikipedia. Now what it would do is mean that your organization has to be sufficiently well known for others to want to present it. This being said, I doubt we can stop the Goons, GBC, etc from creating and editing their own entries.
Actually, while it may be a "no-no" on Wikipedia, It would appear to actively encouraged on EVElopedia. I did in fact create a page for Duty. earlier today, and one "ISD Erilus Nex" was kind enough to come along and point me in the direction of the player corporation template. There's quite an extensive range of categories for pilots, corporations and alliances, and every contributor has a private profile page that they can do whatever they like with. Hell, even the page on the neutrality policy explains that it's quite all right to break from the traditionally neutral PoV of a wiki for the sake of bigging up your corp or character, provided you don't descend into smack. They want new pages, filled in by the players. The pages on Otro Gariushi and Alexander Noir didn't exist before I created them. The page on the Ishukone Corporation consisted entirely of the dry table of details, and none of the recent history or political information. There's a whole category for "fan fiction". The message appears to be "Go. Create." Cleanup can always be done after the fact, but if nobody writes anything down, then it'll never grow. If somebody creates an article that nobody cares about, it can be removed. Here's a short snippet from the category tree: Quote: * Player Organisations = * Player Corporations === * High-Sec Corporations === * 0.0 Corporations === * Low-Sec Corporations === * Roleplay Corporations === * Factional Warfare Corporations = * Player Alliances === * High-Sec Alliances === * 0.0 Alliances === * Low-Sec Alliances === * Roleplay Alliances
and a quote from the Evelopedia guide: Quote: Editing rules, editing conventions, and formatting
The number one rule of wiki editing, is to be bold. Dive in and make changes. Other people can correct mistakes later, so have confidence, and give it a try! There can be all kinds of editing conventions, rules, and philosophy governing the editing of wiki pages, but the "be bold" rule overrides these!
|
 Dex Nederland Caldari Lai Dai Infinity Systems
|
Posted - 2008.12.13 01:33:00 - [ 13]
Edited by: Dex Nederland on 13/12/2008 01:38:55 Well I clearly missed that.
Stitcher, you and I should come up with some templates to expand the info on the Caldari corps and other business corps. |
 Stitcher Caldari Lai Dai Infinity Systems |
Posted - 2008.12.13 09:31:00 - [ 14]
be glad to, but I should warn you that I've got no experience at all with wiki editing.. I'm learning how to do it as I go, so creating a template might be a little beyond me yet. |
 Dex Nederland Caldari Lai Dai Infinity Systems
|
Posted - 2008.12.13 17:00:00 - [ 15]
Same boat as you there Stitcher |
 CCP Dropbear

 |
Posted - 2008.12.15 02:09:00 - [ 16]
Some really nice additions so far, good stuff.  |
 Verone Gallente Veto Corp |
Posted - 2008.12.15 19:38:00 - [ 17]
Originally by: Dex Nederland Same boat as you there Stitcher
Likewise, I can't stand the formatting that Wikis use, still trying to understand and make something of it  |
 Stitcher Caldari Lai Dai Infinity Systems |
Posted - 2008.12.16 02:44:00 - [ 18]
best way to learn seems to be to go make pages. I took the stub article on Caldari Prime and fleshed it out a little, for example. Learned a lot in doing it, too. |
 CCP Ginger

 |
Posted - 2008.12.16 10:07:00 - [ 19]
Excellent work so far guys :)
One thing I would ask, if your going to claim prime fiction elements in your article, please add citations to the relevant sections so everyone knows which bit of prime fiction you are referencing.
This allows us to differentiate between player created fiction and canon related fiction.
Cheers! Ginger. |
 Dex Nederland Caldari Lai Dai Infinity Systems
|
Posted - 2008.12.16 14:57:00 - [ 20]
Originally by: CCP Ginger Excellent work so far guys :)
One thing I would ask, if your going to claim prime fiction elements in your article, please add citations to the relevant sections so everyone knows which bit of prime fiction you are referencing.
This allows us to differentiate between player created fiction and canon related fiction.
Cheers! Ginger.
Ginger - are you looking for us to cite the articles on this database or other wiki eve articles (with appropriate links)? For information currently only captured in-game (such as Ranks w/ descriptions), what kind of reference are you looking for? ex. [Eve-Online Description of Caldari Protectorate Captain] ? Lastly - what about in game events and history? Is that considered PF? Can Dex's lose of a ship to the Brothers of Freedom be captured in a citation beyond his presence there and him saying so? |
 CCP Ginger

 |
Posted - 2008.12.16 16:15:00 - [ 21]
Basically, if your referencing anything offiical, then you should cite it to some official source. Either on this website or on the wiki (i.e. a locked page).
Dont worry about Dex getting shot down in game, you cant really cite that. But news article, backstory articles, chronicles etc etc can all be referenced. This allows you to discuss prime fiction but keep a clear distinction between that and player created stuff.
We'll gradually create more pages and lock them as offiical as we go along hopefully.
|
 Garion Avarr Amarr Adhocracy Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.12.18 22:19:00 - [ 22]
Originally by: CCP Ginger
We'll gradually create more pages and lock them as offiical as we go along hopefully.
I'd just like to state that I highly disagree with this. The point of having pages in a Wiki is that they are editable and constantly improved -- and a number of the pages that are currently locked are in dire need of improvement, some of them being factually inaccurate. The only thing I can see as being justifiably locked on the Wiki is the pages with the chrons, though in my opinion those pages should be about the chrons, not have the chrons on them. |
 Myrhial Arkenath Ghost Festival Naraka. |
Posted - 2008.12.19 08:43:00 - [ 23]
If a page is locked, is the discussion part of that page also locked? And is it possible to report locked pages for not being accurate and so forth? I think either of these or both should be possible. |
 CCP Ginger

 |
Posted - 2008.12.19 08:49:00 - [ 24]
Originally by: Myrhial Arkenath If a page is locked, is the discussion part of that page also locked? And is it possible to report locked pages for not being accurate and so forth? I think either of these or both should be possible.
Im not sure to be honest, but you raise a good point. Mail the moderators about that and if you cant then we'll see about getting it fixed. Keep up the good work guys! |
 CCP Ginger

 |
Posted - 2008.12.19 08:52:00 - [ 25]
Originally by: Garion Avarr
I'd just like to state that I highly disagree with this. The point of having pages in a Wiki is that they are editable and constantly improved -- and a number of the pages that are currently locked are in dire need of improvement, some of them being factually inaccurate.
The only thing I can see as being justifiably locked on the Wiki is the pages with the chrons, though in my opinion those pages should be about the chrons, not have the chrons on them.
Oh I completely agree that the wiki should be open to the community as much as possible. But when were talking about prime fiction articles that are on a CCP wiki we want those articles to be correct, and at the moment locking some of the important ones is the only way to ensure that. Trouble being that players have wildly varying opinions about various aspects of the backstory and we need to provide a solid baseline for the fiction without having to go onto the wiki and sift through the tons of articles being changed by players. However, this is just a preliminary step, were continually looking at what were going to do on the website regarding fiction and are open to any and all suggestions. Thanks for your interest and support. CCP Ginger |
 Kyoko Sakoda Caldari Veto. Veto Corp |
Posted - 2008.12.19 11:16:00 - [ 26]
Will have to find some time myself to keep adding relevent pages but I'm well impressed by what seems to be filled in so far. Stitcher seems on a roll.  |
 Stitcher Caldari Lai Dai Infinity Systems |
Posted - 2008.12.19 11:29:00 - [ 27]
Originally by: Kyoko Sakoda Stitcher seems on a roll. 
can't sleep. Pages need writing. MORE COFFEE!!!! *collapses* |
 Dex Nederland Caldari Lai Dai Infinity Systems
|
Posted - 2008.12.20 04:04:00 - [ 28]
Issue, <ref>reference here</ref> <reference/> as per Wikipedia do not work on wiki.eve-online.com I think this would help with putting in reference material. |
 Taleth Ukk'narr |
Posted - 2008.12.25 01:57:00 - [ 29]
I think that the system Wiki uses is just fine, the articles will settle out, they shouldn't be locked. That only gives you outdated info, in my opinion. |
 Eran Laude Gallente The Aduro Protocol HellFleet |
Posted - 2008.12.25 11:27:00 - [ 30]
I've just set the ball rolling on a Gallente Prime article, but the formatting is evidently wrong. I don't know how to make it conform to screen size, becuase atmo unless you have a VERY wide screen it's too big to fit on one page. Help!  BTW, it is great fun playing with the evelopedia. One thing I have noticed that I'm not allowed to change is that Sanctum constellation in Amarr is coming up as Amarr sovereignty, in actuality it's shared sovereignty between Amarr, CONCORD and the InterBus [If I remember correctly]. Also, the article on Empire Space doesn't list CONCORD and InterBus, I feel technically it should, even though it's one constellation that only ever sees transitory traffic these days. |